Rowlands 2003.
| Methods | Cluster RCT
Follow up:
providers: DONE
patients: N/A
Blinded assessment: DONE
Baseline: NOT CLEAR
Reliable outcomes: DONE
Protection against contamination: DONE Overall quality: MODERATE |
|
| Participants | 26 practices with four or more partners
Country: UK
Proportion of eligible providers who participated: 9%
General practice Academic/Teaching setting: NOT CLEAR Type of targeted behaviour: other (referrals to specialist services) Complexity of targeted behaviour: LOW |
|
| Interventions | 1. CME: several within‐practice educational meetings, total of 5 hrs on average for each practice 2. No intervention control | |
| Outcomes | Professional practice: referral rates Patient: none Seriousness of outcome: LOW | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |