Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2

Scheel 2002.

Methods Cluster RCT 
 Follow up: 
 providers: DONE 
 patients: DONE 
 Blinded assessment: DONE 
 Baseline: NOT DONE? 
 Reliable outcomes: DONE 
 Protection against contamination: DONE
Overall quality: HIGH
Participants General practitioners, back pain patients, their employers and local National Insurance Administration staff in 65 municipalities in 3 counties 
 Country: Norway 
 Proportion of eligible providers who participated: 100% 
 Primary care
Academic/Teaching setting: NON‐TEACHING 
 Type of targeted behaviour: GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF A PROBLEM (use of active sick leave for back pain) 
 Complexity of targeted behaviour: MEDIUM
Interventions 1. CME: continuing education workshop for GPs on low back pain and active sick leave + targeted information to patients, the local National Insurance Administration staff and employers + a new check box in the form for reporting sick leave (=reminder) + a standard agreement plan between employer and employee for rehabilitation + desktop summary for GPs of clinical practice guidelines + resource person for each region to support GPs and follow‐up patients on sick leave for >16 days 
 2. No intervention control + a third group having a passive strategy: targeted information, check box in report of sick leave, standard agreement and desktop summary
Outcomes Professional practice: % of patients on active sick leave 
 Patient: none 
 Seriousness of outcome: LOW
Notes No baseline data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate