Thom 1999.
| Methods | Cluster RCT
Follow up:
providers: DONE
patients: NOT CLEAR
Blinded assessment: DONE
Baseline: DONE
Reliable outcomes: NOT CLEAR
Protection against contamination: DONE Overall quality: MODERATE |
|
| Participants | 20 family practice physicians Country: USA Proportion of eligible providers who participated: 31% Family practitioners Academic/Teaching setting: NOT CLEAR Type of targeted behaviour: OTHER (building patients' trust in their physician) Complexity of targeted behaviour: HIGH | |
| Interventions | 1. CME: problem‐based, small group discussions with brief didactic presentations, viewing of videotaped patient encounters and role‐playing, 7 hrs 2. Control: NONE | |
| Outcomes | Professional practice: no primary specified ‐ no baseline so cannot choose the highest? Patient: mean trust score Seriousness of outcome: HIGH | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |