Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2

Woodcock 1999.

Methods Cluster RCT 
 Follow up: 
 providers: NOT CLEAR 
 patients: NOT DONE 
 Blinded assessment: DONE 
 Baseline: NOT DONE 
 Reliable outcomes: NOT CLEAR 
 Protection against contamination: DONE
Overall quality: LOW
Participants 107 general practitioners and nurses in 41 practices 
 Country: UK 
 Proportion of eligible providers who participated: NOT CLEAR 
 General practice 
 Academic/Teaching setting: NON‐TEACHING 
 Type of targeted behaviour: GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF A PROBLEM (patient centred diabetes care) 
 Complexity of targeted behaviour: LOW
Interventions 1. CME: general practitioners: 0.5‐day group training; nurses: 1.5 days 
 2. Control: no intervention control
Outcomes Professional practice: patients' recognition of a patient booklet, recognition of an insert to the booklet, patients' reports of nurse consulting behaviour 
 Patient: none 
 Seriousness of outcome: MODERATE
Notes No baseline data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate