Woodcock 1999.
| Methods | Cluster RCT
Follow up:
providers: NOT CLEAR
patients: NOT DONE
Blinded assessment: DONE
Baseline: NOT DONE
Reliable outcomes: NOT CLEAR
Protection against contamination: DONE Overall quality: LOW |
|
| Participants | 107 general practitioners and nurses in 41 practices Country: UK Proportion of eligible providers who participated: NOT CLEAR General practice Academic/Teaching setting: NON‐TEACHING Type of targeted behaviour: GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF A PROBLEM (patient centred diabetes care) Complexity of targeted behaviour: LOW | |
| Interventions | 1. CME: general practitioners: 0.5‐day group training; nurses: 1.5 days 2. Control: no intervention control | |
| Outcomes | Professional practice: patients' recognition of a patient booklet, recognition of an insert to the booklet, patients' reports of nurse consulting behaviour Patient: none Seriousness of outcome: MODERATE | |
| Notes | No baseline data | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |