Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 14;2014(3):CD003007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3

Filiz 2005.

Methods Randomised by opaque envelopes prepared by independent person
Participants 60 patients (three arms) included one month after first‐time lumbar disc surgery. Aged between 20 and 50 years. Only short‐term follow‐up
Interventions (I1, N = 20) intensive exercise programme and back school education under supervision for eight weeks; three days a week with sessions of 1.5 hours each. (I2, N = 20) back education and McKenzie and Williams exercise in home programme for eight weeks; advice to practice three days/wk. (C, N = 20) no treatment
Outcomes RTW in days (I1) 56.07 (18.66) versus (I2) 75.0 (24.9) versus (C) 86.2 (27.1). Pain (post‐treatment score on VAS): (I1) 4.5 (1.6) versus (I2) 12.0 (3.7) versus (C) 13.3 (7.3). Functional status (post‐treatment scores on Modified Oswestry): (I1) 7.1 (4.9) versus (I2) 11.7 versus (C) 15.1 (8.6)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised opaque envelopes prepared by independent person
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sheets of opaque paper, folded  and taped from the corners, put in a box
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? High risk Intensive exercise versus home exercise
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ care providers? High risk Intensive exercise versus home exercise
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors? High risk Patient reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs? Unclear risk Unclear from text
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis? Unclear risk Dropouts, if any, not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk VAS, ODI, LBPRS
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk Table 1
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? Unclear risk Unclear from text
Compliance acceptable? Unclear risk Unclear from text
Timing outcome assessments similar? Low risk Eight weeks (post‐treatment)