Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 14;2014(3):CD003007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3

Scrimshaw 2001.

Methods Randomisation by random numbers table, unclear concealment
Participants 81 patients undergoing spinal surgery randomly assigned, 59 of whom underwent laminectomy or discectomy. Others were operated for fusion
Interventions (I) (N = 32) Standard postoperative care (isometric and dynamic exercises, progress as tolerated) AND active and passive exercises for neural mobilisation (six days in hospital, encouraged to continue for at least six weeks)
 (C) Standard postoperative care ONLY (isometric and dynamic exercises, progress as tolerated)
Outcomes Overall improvement at 12 months (I) 67.7% versus (C) 68.9%
 Pain (VAS) six weeks' score (I) 26.6 (SD: 29.3) versus (C) 33.4 (SD: 30.6); at 12 months (I) 33.4 (SD: 34.2) versus (C) 25.7 (SD: 29.18)
 Functional status (QBPQ) at six weeks (I) 34.9 (SD: 22.9) versus (C) 30.4 (SD: 22.8), at 12 months (I) 29.9 (SD: 24.1) versus (C) 27.2 (SD: 24.8)
Notes Unpublished data used for analyses so that only the 59 participants who underwent laminectomy or discectomy were included
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear from text
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? High risk Addition of neural mobilisation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ care providers? High risk Addition of neural mobilisation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors? High risk Patient reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs? Low risk Results paragraph 1
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis? High risk Dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk VAS, McGill, Quebec, reported in outcome measures and in results
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk Table 1
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? Low risk Equal exercise programme
Compliance acceptable? High risk 37/46 control and 28/34 intervention compliant, results
Timing outcome assessments similar? Low risk 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months