Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;14(4):721–741. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12642

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Evaluation of existing histological markers to differentiate TET subtypes. (A) Marker protein abundances across different tissue types quantified from MS data (type A, n = 5; type AB, n = 8; type B, n = 17; type TSCC, n = 10; type adjacent, n = 40; type normal, n = 10), and data were shown as mean ± SEM. (B) HE and IHC staining of two clinical IHC markers, TdT and Cathepsin V, across different TET subtypes. IHC images were at 100× magnification. Results showed Cathepsin V is highly specific to type B thymoma, whereas TdT showed less specific than Cathepsin V, with expression also found in type AB.