Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;2020(4):CD012309. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012309.pub2

Comparison 1. Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy versus dacryocystorhinostomy alone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Functional success, defined as the relief of epiphora 20   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Follow‐up: 6 months 7 356 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.98, 1.29]
1.2 Follow‐up: > 6 months 14 909 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.15 [1.07, 1.25]
2 Anatomic success, defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation 14   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Follow‐up: 6 months 4 306 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.95, 1.11]
2.2 Follow‐up: > 6 months 12 831 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [1.04, 1.15]
3 Ostium size on nasal endoscopy 3   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Follow‐up: 6 months 2 65 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.93 [3.40, 6.46]
3.2 Follow‐up: > 6 months 2 100 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.35 [1.58, 3.12]