Table 4:
Men | Women | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 14 | Model 25 | Model 14 | Model 25 | |
RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | |
Exposure Variable6 | ||||
MVPA-SR (EU), model a | Model 1a | Model 2a | Model 1a | Model 2a |
T1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
T2 | 1.00 (0.76–1.27) | 1.00 (0.84–1.19) | 0.78 (0.61–1.00) | 0.96 (0.82–1.123) |
T3 | 1.02 (0.79–1.33) | 1.01 (0.84–1.21) | 0.88 (0.70–1.11) | 0.95 (0.80–1.12) |
p for trend | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.25 | 0.51 |
MVPA-Acc(mins/wk, cts≥2020), model b | Model 1b | Model 2b | Model 1b | Model 2b |
T1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
T2 | 0.92 (0.71–1.18) | 0.89 (0.75–1.05) | 0.88 (0.70–1.11) | 0.90 (0.78–1.04) |
T3 | 0.82 (0.63–1.07) | 0.84 (0.70–1.01) | 0.80 (0.63–1.02) | 0.85 (0.72–1.01) |
p for trend | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |
Both PA Measures, model c | Model 1c | Model 2c | Model 1c | Model 2c |
MVPA-SR | ||||
T1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
T2 | 1.01 (0.77–1.33) | 1.02 (0.85–1.21) | 0.80 (0.63–1.03) | 0.97 (0.83–1.14) |
T3 | 1.05 (0.81–1.36) | 1.04 (0.87–1.25) | 0.93 (0.73–1.18) | 0.99 (0.83–1.17) |
p for trend | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.85 |
MVPA-Acc | ||||
T1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
T2 | 0.91 (0.70–1.18) | 0.88 (0.74–1.05) | 0.89 (0.70–1.13) | 0.90 (0.78–1.05) |
T3 | 0.82 (0.63–1.07) | 0.84 (0.69–1.01) | 0.82 (0.64–1.05) | 0.85 (0.72–1.02) |
p for trend | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
Relative risk estimated from modified Poisson regression
Defined as systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 or use of antihypertensive medication (N=195 mean, 246 women)
Based on those whose hypertension status at Years 25 or 30 could be ascertained (N=2014)
Adjusted for race, age, education, and Year 20 systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Additionally adjusted for BMI
Three different PA exposure variables examined for each model: a) MVPA-SR only; b) MVPA-Acc only; and c) both MVPA-SR and MVPA-Acc adjusted for each other