Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2019 Oct 23;129 Suppl:105859. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105859

Table 2.

Implementation outcomes.

Proctor et al.’s implementation outcomes (Proctor et al., 2011) Collaborative implementation outcomes Definition Measurement
Adoption - setting Adoption FQHCs that signed the participant agreement (n = 9) Center demographics from the Uniform Data System (Health Resources and Services Administration Health Center Program: 2018. Health Center Data, n.d.-b)
Adoption - provider Engagement FQHC and individual attendance at in-person collaborative meetings and monthly calls Lobbyguard software and Poll Everywhere item
Implementation Fidelity Implementation of QI tools QI tools that were filled out and acted upon by FQHC staff during the collaborative Log of completed QI tools
Penetration Spread of QI tools Tools that were applied to other screening/conditions or other populations Baseline and follow-up inventory and post-collaborative focus group
Intervention fidelity Implementation of CRC screening EBIs Implementation of interventions recommended by the Guide to Community Preventive Services Baseline and follow-up inventory
Effectiveness CRC screening rates Percentage of adults 50–75 years of age who had appropriate screening for colorectal cancer The 2016, 2017, 2018 Uniform Data System (Health Resources and Services Administration Health Center Program: 2018. Health Center Data, n.d.-b)
Appropriateness Influence of implementation strategies on CRC screening rates Implementation staff perceptions of how collaborative strategies led to systems change and increase in screening rates Post-collaborative focus group