Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 25;150(4):901–909. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz325

TABLE 3.

Multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI for cognitive impairment according to quartiles of fat intake: the Singapore Chinese Health Study

Quartiles of fat intake
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P-trend1
Total fat
 Cases/n 674/4184 676/4184 558/4184 489/4184
 Median,2 g/d 33.9 (26.7–37.1) 42.2 (40.6–43.6) 47.7 (46.3–49.2) 55.3 (52.7–59.4)
 Model 13 1.00 0.97 (0.86–1.10) 0.83 (0.73–0.94) 0.78 (0.68–0.89) <0.001
 Model 24 1.00 1.01 (0.88–1.16) 0.86 (0.74–1.00) 0.80 (0.67–0.94) 0.003
SFAs
 Cases/n 646/4184 645/4184 588/4184 518/4184
 Median,2 g/d 10.7 (8.64–12.0) 14.4 (13.7–15.1) 17.0 (16.3–17.7) 20.7 (19.5–22.7)
 Model 13 1.00 1.03 (0.91–1.17) 0.96 (0.84–1.09) 0.93 (0.81–1.06) 0.16
 Model 24 1.00 1.08 (0.94–1.25) 1.05 (0.89–1.24) 1.08 (0.89–1.31) 0.51
MUFAs
 Cases/n 666/4184 681/4184 559/4184 491/4184
 Median,2 g/d 11.1 (8.83–12.1) 14.1 (13.5–14.6) 16.1 (15.6–16.7) 19.0 (18.0–20.6)
 Model 13 1.00 1.01 (0.89–1.15) 0.84 (0.73–0.95) 0.78 (0.68–0.89) <0.001
 Model 24 1.00 1.03 (0.88–1.19) 0.85 (0.71–1.02) 0.80 (0.64–0.99) 0.02
 Model 35 1.00 1.08 (0.92–1.26) 0.87 (0.71–1.05) 0.77 (0.61–0.97) 0.02
PUFAs
 Cases/n 663/4184 642/4184 553/4184 539/4184
 Median,2 g/d 5.95 (4.63–6.53) 7.75 (7.37–8.10) 9.35 (8.90–9.92) 12.9 (11.6–14.9)
 Model 13 1.00 0.91 (0.80–1.04) 0.76 (0.66–0.86) 0.74 (0.65–0.85) <0.001
 Model 24 1.00 0.99 (0.86–1.14) 0.86 (0.74–1.01) 0.84 (0.72–0.99) 0.02
 Model 35 1.00 0.99 (0.86–1.14) 0.85 (0.73–0.99) 0.82 (0.70–0.95) 0.003
Animal-based fat
 Cases/n 639/4184 612/4184 611/4184 535/4184
 Median,2 g/d 8.66 (6.03–10.2) 13.2 (12.3–14.0) 16.5 (15.6–17.4) 21.3 (19.7–24.2)
 Model 13 1.00 0.93 (0.82–1.06) 0.98 (0.86–1.12) 0.92 (0.81–1.05) 0.31
 Model 24 1.00 0.98 (0.85–1.13) 1.04 (0.89–1.22) 0.96 (0.81–1.15) 0.76
Plant-based fat
 Cases/n 662/4184 634/4184 583/4184 518/4184
 Median,2 g/d 21.0 (17.2–23.2) 27.2 (26.0–28.3) 31.5 (30.3–32.6) 38.3 (35.9–42.3)
 Model 13 1.00 0.91 (0.80–1.04) 0.86 (0.75–0.98) 0.78 (0.68–0.89) <0.001
 Model 24 1.00 0.97 (0.84–1.10) 0.91 (0.79–1.05) 0.84 (0.72–0.98) 0.02
1

P-trend was estimated using median values of quartiles as a continuous variable in logistic models.

2

Median intakes are shown as median value (IQR).

3

Model 1 was adjusted for age at cognition assessment, sex, educational level, marital status, dialect groups, and total energy intake.

4

Model 2 was further adjusted for BMI, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep duration, physician-diagnosed history of diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, stroke, and cancer, and dietary intake of protein, cholesterol, and fiber (quartiles). Different types of fat were included in the model simultaneously.

5

Model 3 further included carbohydrate intake but excluded SFA from the model.