TABLE 3.
Between-diet comparison of enriched bacteria in adults at increased cardiovascular risk with available fecal samples (n = 42)1
| Comparison2 | Diet | LDA score | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD vs. run-in | |||
| D_5__Roseburia | WD | 4.17 | 0.0008 |
| D_5__Eubacterium_eligensgroup | WD | 3.62 | 0.05 |
| D_5__Lachnospiraceae UCG_001 | WD | 3.19 | 0.03 |
| D_5__Lachnospiraceae UCG_004 | WD | 3.07 | 0.04 |
| D_4__Leuconostocaceae | WD | 2.8 | 0.05 |
| D_5__Ruminococcaceae UCG_003 | WD | 2.75 | 0.03 |
| D_5__Butyricicoccus | WD | 2.37 | 0.01 |
| WFMD vs. run-in | |||
| D_5__Roseburia | WFMD | 3.77 | 0.02 |
| D_5__Eubacterium_eligensgroup | WFMD | 3.44 | 0.02 |
| D_5__gutmetagenome | WFMD | 3.12 | 0.01 |
| D_5__Butyricicoccus | WFMD | 2.95 | 0.02 |
| D_4__Streptococcaceae | Run-in | 3.33 | 0.05 |
| D_5__Streptococcus | Run-in | 3.35 | 0.02 |
| ORAD vs. run-in | |||
| D_5__Streptococcus | Run-in | 2.83 | 0.03 |
| D_5__gutmetagenome | ORAD | 2.44 | 0.005 |
| D_4__Clostridiaesvadin BB60group | ORAD | 2.48 | 0.04 |
| WD vs. WFMD | |||
| D_5__Faecalibacterium | WFMD | 4.27 | 0.03 |
| D_5__Angelakisella | WFMD | 2.78 | 0.04 |
| D_5__Gordonibacter | WD | 3.22 | 0.03 |
| WD vs. ORAD | |||
| D_5__Roseburia | WD | 4.1 | 0.02 |
| D_5__ Defluviitaleaceae UCG_011 | WD | 1.63 | 0.01 |
| D_4__Defluviitaleaceae | WD | 1.62 | 0.01 |
| D_5__Ruminiclostridium1 | ORAD | 1.43 | 0.04 |
| D_4__Clostridialesvain BB60group | ORAD | 2.35 | 0.03 |
1
LEfSe plots for between-diet and study diet–run-in diet comparisons of enriched taxa. LDA, linear discriminant analysis; LEfSe, linear discriminant analysis effect size; ORAD, oleic acid replaces α-linolenic acid diet; WD, walnut diet; WFMD, walnut fatty acid matched diet.
2
D_5_ indicates that this bacterial species has been identified down to the genus taxonomic level and D_4_ indicates this bacteria has been identified down to the family level.