Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2020 May;31(3):319–326. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001182

Table 2.

Sensitivity of estimates of relative risk on the peak flood day (July 21, 2012) to study design and modeling choices. The first row repeats the estimates generated based on our primary analysis (also shown in Table 1). All other rows show estimates based on alternative study design or modeling choices; see the Methods for descriptions of each. Shown in parentheses are the 95% confidence intervals for each estimate.

All-cause mortality Circulatory mortality Respiratory mortality Accidental mortality
Primary analysis 1.34 (1.11, 1.61) 1.37 (1.01, 1.85) 0.94 (0.52, 1.72) 4.40 (2.98, 6.51)
Matching by month 1.35 (1.11, 1.63) 1.38 (1.01, 1.88) 0.91 (0.50, 1.66) 3.86 (2.70, 5.54)
PM2.5-adjusted 1.33 (1.09, 1.62) 1.32 (0.97, 1.79) 0.90 (0.49, 1.66) 4.55 (2.96, 6.98)
Not temperature-adjusted 1.27 (1.02, 1.57) 1.28 (0.92, 1.77) 0.88 (0.48, 1.64) 4.22 (2.87, 6.21)
Time series 1.30 (1.11, 1.52) 1.33 (1.06, 1.67) 0.93 (0.55, 1.56) 5.48 (3.73, 8.06)
Case-crossover 1.33 (1.09, 1.62) 1.38 (1.04, 1.83) 0.85 (0.46, 1.57) 6.64 (3.48, 12.67)