Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;10:6007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62898-9

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Flow channel phantom validates the proposed method. (a) Reference ULM intensity and velocity images of the flow channel phantom that were generated by combining eight individually processed ULM images from separate acquisitions at a low microbubble concentration (a total of four different flow speeds and two different flow directions). (b) The combined ULM flow channel image demonstrated a well-defined parabolic flow profile. (c) Conventional ULM image processing performed on a high microbubble concentration dataset did not result in an adequate number of high-confidence microbubble events to populate the vessel lumen and (d) did not produce a meaningful flow profile. (e) Performing microbubble separation on the high microbubble concentration dataset allowed for accurate reconstruction and filling of the vessel lumen and (f) could recover a parabolic flow profile.