Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;12(3):893–906. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.107

Table S3. Studies’ inclusion, exclusion criteria. Choice of procedure and valve type.

Study (ref) Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Selection criteria for the procedure Selection criteria for the valve
Abdel-Wahab et al. 2016 (20) Patients treated with new generation devices Patients treated with new generation, self-expanding devices Not reported Not reported
Fovino et al. 2017 (21) All consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI with Sapien 3 in the PUREVALVE registry (n=93) were matched with patients (n=222) undergoing transfemoral TAVI with the Lotus valve included in the RELEVANT study A life expectancy of less than 1-year, congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve, severe peripheral artery disease (femoral artery lumen diameter <6.0 mm) and valve-in-valve procedure Patients were candidate to TAVI by the local Heart Team on the basis of surgical risk score, as well as frailty and presence of comorbidities Not reported
Jarr et al. 2017 (23) Not reported Not reported The decision regarding whether patients were scheduled for TAVI or SAVR was made by institution heart team The decision regarding the valve type used was at the operator’s discretion
Marzahn et al. 2018 (24) Patients with high-grade aortic stenosis who
underwent TAVI
Not reported All patients were evaluated for TAVI by an interdisciplinary heart Prostheses were selected by the implanting cardiologist before intervention based on the patients’ morphology
Pilgrim et al. 2016 (25) Patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with the Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis or the Lotus valve system Not reported Selection of TAVI candidates, device allocation, and periprocedural management was left to the discretion of the operators Selection of TAVI candidates, device allocation, and periprocedural management was left to the discretion of the operators
Schofer et al. 2018 (26) Consecutive patients with severe symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis who were indicated to receive transfemoral TAVI either by using the Sapien 3 or the Lotus valve Not reported Based on an interdisciplinary heart team decision, patients were allocated to TAVI Not reported
Seeger et al. 2017 (27) Not reported Not reported Decision about suitability for TAVI was assessed by the heart team Sapien 3 was chosen in annulus diameter >27 mm and short distance annulus to coronary ostia; Lotus was chosen in severe left ventricular outflow tract calcification and thrombus in left atrial appendage
Sinning et al. 2017 (28) Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Soliman et al. 2018 (29) Patients who underwent TAVI because of severe aortic stenosis with either the Lotus or the Sapien 3 Valve-in-valve procedure or TAVI because of aortic regurgitation or patients without echocardiographic follow-up Eligibility for TAVI and vascular access (i.e., femoral, axillary and apex) was decided during the multidisciplinary valve team discussion The choice of the valve type was at the operator’s discretion
van Gils et al. 2017 (22) All consecutive patients with preexistent right bundle branch block without a permanent pacemaker Transcatheter heart valves with <10 cases Not reported Not reported
Wöhrle et al. 2015 (30) Patients with severe aortic stenosis in combination with the presence of clinical symptoms Life expectancy of less than 12 months, congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve, acute myocardial infarction, stroke or severe gastrointestinal bleeding within the previous 3 months or severe peripheral artery disease favoring the transapical route for TAVI The decision to perform TAVI was made by a multidisciplinary heart team including an interventional cardiologist and a cardiothoracic surgeon Not reported

PUREVALVE, Padua University REVALving Experirnce; RELEVANT, REgistry of Lotus valvE for treatment of aortic VAlve steNosis with Tavr; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement.