Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 19;7(2):ENEURO.0320-19.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0320-19.2020

Table 3.

PERG amplitudes-Group II

Group II
(mice groups)
Time points Amplitude(μV; mean ± SEM) KS normality test
(p value)
Two-way ANOVA
(p value)
Tukey’s multiple comparison test p value and
95% confidence interval (CI)
Control/Veh-ttd (vs) EAE/Veh-ttd Control/Veh-ttd (vs) EAE-Klf4fl/fl/Cre-ttd EAE/Veh-ttd (vs) EAE Klf4fl/fl/ Cre-ttd
Control Baseline 26.93 ± 1.99 >0.1 Row factor:
p = 0.0100;
column factor:
p = 0.0003;
interaction: row factor x column factor: p = 0.028
p = 0.808
CI:
–5.102 to 8.54
p = 0.99
CI:
–6.624 to 7.022
p = 0.846
CI:
–8.344 to 5.301
EAE Baseline 25.21 ± 1.60 >0.1
EAE-Klf4fl/fl Baseline 26.74 ± 1.31 >0.1
Control 9 MPS 27.60 ± 1.92 >0.1 p = 0.001
CI:
4.037 to 17.68
p = 0.001
CI:
4.264 to 17.91
p = 0.99
CI:
–6.596 to 7.049
EAE 9 MPS 16.74 ± 1.70 >0.1
EAE-Klf4fl/fl 9 MPS 16.52 ± 1.19 >0.1
Control-Veh-ttd 18 MPS
(9 MPI)
28.11 ± 3.87 >0.1 p = 0.0002
CI:
5.819 to 19.46
p = 0.092
CI:
–0.8202 to 12.82
p = 0.057
CI:
–13.46 to 0.1831
EAE-Veh-ttd 18 MPS
(9 MPI)
15.46 ± 1.52 >0.1
EAE-Klf4fl/fl - Cre-ttd 18 MPS
(9 MPI)
22.10 ± 1.36 >0.1

Bold indicates statistically significant difference of p values.