Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;12(3):578. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030578

Table 3.

Comparison of the performance of the models measured by difference in the area-under-the-curve (AUCs) across 1000 permuted runs. Each entry in the table has p-value, average difference of AUC of the models, and confidence interval of 1000 AUCs.

Classification models Ia: Imaging Ib: Texture Ic: Clinical IIa: Imaging+Texture IIb: Imaging+Clinical IIc: Texture+Clinical
Ia:Imaging --- 0.530, −0.01
(−0.27, 0.25)
0.636, −0.05 (−0.34,0.25) --- --- ---
Ib:Texture --- --- 0.598, −0.05 (−0.31,0.25) --- --- ---
IIa:Imaging+Texture 0.045, 0.09 (−0.08,0.34) 0.048, 0.10 (−0.06,0.35) 0.032, 0.20 (−0.06,0.42) --- 0.606, −0.02 (−0.19,0.15) 0.562, −0.01 (−0.17,0.15)
IIb:Imaging+Clinical 0.173, 0.12 (−0.11,0.34) 0.123, 0.13 (−0.09,0.34) 0.109, 0.17 (−0.09,0.41) --- --- 0.457, 0.01 (−0.17,0.19)
IIc:Texture+Clinical 0.146, 0.13 (−0.09,0.34) 0.117, 0.14 (−0.09,0.33) 0.102, 0.18 (−0.08,0.41) --- --- ---
IIIa:Imaging+Texture+Clinical 0.002, 0.26 (0.07,0.43) 0.001, 0.27 (0.09,0.44) 0.001, 0.32 (0.08,0.50) 0.004, 0.12 (0.01,0.23) 0.009, 0.14 (0.02,0.27) 0.010, 0.13 (0.02,0.27)