Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 21;21(6):2161. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062161

Table 2.

Comparing CTC status, CTC count, and PFS and OS between subgroups defined by specific patterns of tumor subtype conversion.

Statistics Total, n (%) CTC Positive, n (%) CTC Count, Median (Range) PFS, Median (Range) OS, Median (Range)
Receptors (PT > MT)
ER + HER2 Ø > ER + HER2 Ø 138 (100%) 53 (38.4%) 1 (0–200,000) 6 (1–76) 20.5 (0–94)
ER Ø HER2 Ø > ER Ø HER2 Ø 35 (100%) 14 (40%) 1 (0–74) 4.5 (0–18) 11 (0–94)
ER + HER2 + > ER Ø HER2 Ø 19 (100%) 8 (42.1%) 3 (0–840) 5 (0–19) 10 (0–29.5)
HER2 + > HER2 + 35 (100%) 3 (8.6%) 0 (0–100) 4 (0–26) 15 (0–92)
HER2 Ø > HER2 + 17 (100%) 5(29.4%) 0 (0–91) 7 (1–30) 29 (4–55)
ER Ø HER2 + > ER + HER2 Ø 9 (100%) 4(44.4%) 0 (0–840) 4.5 (2–14) 7 (3–43)
ER Ø HER2 Ø > ER + HER2 Ø 8 (100%) 3(37.5%) 3 (0–22) 3 (1–32) 21 (0–55)
p 0.04 0.23 0.6 0.07

Ø—negative; ER—estrogen receptor; HER2—human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.