Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 14;12(3):689. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030689

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses for DFS and OS in adult M0 ACC patients from TCGA.

DFS * Univariate Multivariate ** Multivariate **
n HR [95% CI] p-Value n HR [95% CI] p-Value n HR [95% CI] p-Value
Age, median 64 0.99 [0.97–1.02] 0.682
Sex male vs. female 64 0.79 [0.36–1.72] 0.546
ENSAT stage 2–3 vs. 1 62 2.86 [0.67–12.2] 0.155
Pathological tumor size (pT) pT2 vs. pT1 62 2.11 [0.48–9.30] 1.01 × 10−2 56 2.41 [0.53–11.02] 0.257 56 3.98 [0.82–19.29] 0.087
pT3 vs. pT1 6.99 [1.33–36.9] 56 9.39 [1.41–62.54] 2.07 × 10−2 56 21.1 [2.73–163.4] 3.47 × 10−3
pT4 vs. pT1 9.02 [1.58–51.6] 56 20.7 [1.62–264.7] 1.98 × 10−2 56 28.0 [2.60–301.4] 5.98 × 10−3
Pathological lymph node (pN) pN1 vs. pN0 62 1.81 [0.42–7.78] 0.423
Surgical margins status R1-R2 vs. R0 56 5.10 [1.13–23.0] 3.38 × 10−2 56 1.04 [0.13–8.59] 0.970 56 0.55 [0.08–3.69] 0.540
Weiss classification high vs. low 49 3.00 [0.94–9.52] 0.063
Steroid hormone secretion excess yes vs. no 59 2.50 [0.93–6.71] 0.068
Adjuvant mitotane yes vs. no 61 1.44 [0.65–3.19] 0.372
Adjuvant radiotherapy yes vs. no 62 1.67 [0.66–4.21] 0.282
MKI67 mRNA status high vs. low 64 3.60 [1.64–7.89] 1.38 × 10−3 56 1.65 [0.58–4.69] 0.350 56 1.19 [0.38–3.73] 0.760
TP53 mutation status wt vs. mt 64 0.28 [0.09–0.86] 2.58 × 10−2 56 0.84 [0.11–6.41] 0.870 56 0.72 [0.13–4.07] 0.707
FATE1 class high vs. low 64 2.51 [1.09–5.74] 2.98 × 10−2 56 5.18 [1.53–17.5] 8.16 × 10−3
FATE1, continuous value 64 1.14 [1.04–1.25] 3.79 × 10−3 56 1.23 [1.08–1.40] 1.84 × 10−3
OS * Univariate Multivariate ** Multivariate **
n HR [95% CI] p-Value n HR [95% CI] p-Value n HR [95% CI] p-Value
Age, median 64 1.00 [0.96–1.03] 0.834
Sex male vs. female 64 1.45 [0.51–4.15] 0.485
ENSAT stage 2–3 vs. 1 62 2.97 [0.38–23.0] 0.298
Pathological tumor size (pT) pT2 vs. pT1 62 1.85 [0.22–15.5] 5.56 × 10−3 56 5.7 [0.48–67.17] 0.167 56 9.0 [0.68–118.0] 0.096
pT3 vs. pT1 6.83 [0.57–81.8] 56 29.0 [1.20–700.7] 3.83 × 10−2 56 37.33 [1.46–952] 2.85 × 10−2
pT4 vs. pT1 21.6 [2.08–224] 56 16.3 [0.68–393.8] 0.085 56 21.07 [1.00–443] 4.99 × 10−2
Pathological lymph node (pN) pN1 vs. pN0 62 0.00 [0.00 - Inf.] 0.998
Surgical margins status R1-R2 vs. R0 56 35.7 [3.22–395] 3.59 × 10−3 56 3.47 [0.20–60.72] 0.395 56 2.84 [0.17–48.4] 0.472
Weiss classification high vs. low 49 4.79 [0.92–24.8] 0.062
Steroid hormone secretion excess yes vs. no 59 3.17 [0.70–14.3] 0.134
Adjuvant mitotane yes vs. no 61 2.18 [0.65–7.29] 0.208
Adjuvant radiotherapy yes vs. no 62 1.06 [0.23–4.84] 0.938
MKI67 mRNA status high vs. low 64 8.87 [2.45–32.2] 8.99 × 10−4 56 5.28 [0.97–28.80] 0.055 56 3.26 [0.51–20.9] 0.212
TP53 mutation status wt vs. mt 64 0.15 [0.04–0.60] 7.79 × 10−3 56 0.21 [0.02–2.08] 0.183 56 0.18 [0.02–1.49] 0.112
FATE1 class high vs. low 64 3.66 [1.01–13.2] 4.78 × 10−2 56 8.74 [0.95–80.52] 5.60 × 10−2
FATE1, continuous value 64 1.19 [1.06–1.34] 4.06 × 10−3 56 1.23 [1.01–1.49] 4.34 × 10−2

* n = 64 M0 patients; ** the multivariate analysis was performed with FATE1 both as a binary variable (left) and as a continuous variable (right).