Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;13:203. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05034-0

Table 1.

Clinical findings of ITU and ward patients in comparison to healthy control

ITU (n = 16) Ward (n = 15) Outpatient (n = 15)
Female 9 9 9
Agea 57 (38–68) 64 (38–80) 49 (43–63)
SOFAb 9 (4–12) 1 (0–3) N/A
CURB-65b 3 (3–4) 3 (1–4) N/A
Mortality (28 day) 2 0 0
Hospital LOS 18 (9–26) 6 (2–11) N/A
ICU LOS 10 (4-17) N/A N/A
Respiratory support Invasive ventilation = 11 Room air = 11 Room air = 15
Face mask CPAP = 3 Nasal specs = 4
Face mask high flow = 2
Microbiology No growth = 9 No growth = 15 N/A
S. pneumoniae = 3
E. coli = 1
Influenza = 1
Metapneumovirus = 2
Beta-lactam antibiotic (glycopeptide synthase inhibitor if penicillin allergic) Benzylpenicillin = 4 Benzylpenicillin = 9 N/A
Amoxicillin = 2 Amoxicillin = 1
Tazocin = 9 Tazocin = 4
Teicoplanin = 1
Adjunct antibiotic Clarithromycin = 13 Clarithromycin = 11
Clindamycin = 1 Ciprofloxacin = 1
Gentamicin = 1
Metronidazole = 1
Antiviral Oseltamavir = 3 Oseltamivir = 1

ITU, severe sepsis patients; ward, sepsis patients; outpatient indicates healthy control; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment score; CURB-65, pneumonia severity score based on confusion, urea nitrogen > 20 mg/dL, respiratory rate > 30 breaths/min, heart beat: Systolic BP < 90 mmHg or diastolic BP < or = 60 mmHg) and Age ≥ 65; ICU, intensive care unit; LOS; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; N/A, not applied

aMedian (range)

bMedian (25th–75th percentile)