Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;13:176. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04049-7

Table 3.

Results of the GLMM testing the influence of location/year and coinfection in the nest on Rickettsia spp. prevalence in larvae collected in Hanover, Hamburg and Mellendorf (n = 1220 larvae from 43 nests)

Factor Estimate SE z P
Intercept − 4.786 1.015 − 4.717 < 0.001
 Hamburg 2011 vs Hanover 2010 1.433 0.997 1.437 0.693
 Hanover 2015 vs Hamburg 2011 1.971 1.304 1.512 0.644
 Hanover 2017 vs Hamburg 2011 − 1.373 1.001 − 1.372 0.734
 Hanover 2018 vs Hamburg 2011 − 1.349 0.961 − 1.403 0.715
 Hanover 2015 vs Hanover 2010 3.404 1.440 2.365 0.161
 Hanover 2017 vs Hanover 2010 0.060 1.188 0.051 1.000
 Hanover 2018 vs Hanover 2010 0.084 1.154 0.073 1.000
 Hanover 2017 vs Hanover 2015 − 3.344 1.427 − 2.343 0.169
 Hanover 2018 vs Hanover 2015 − 3.320 1.399 − 2.373 0.158
 Hanover 2018 vs Hanover 2017 0.024 1.148 0.021 1.000
 Mellendorf 2018 vs Hanover 2010 2.956 0.990 2.986 0.032
 Mellendorf 2018 vs Hanover 2015 − 0.448 1.288 − 0.348 0.999
 Mellendorf 2018 vs Hanover 2017 2.896 0.984 2.942 0.036
 Mellendorf 2018 vs Hanover 2018 2.872 0.945 3.038 0.027
 Mellendorf 2018 vs Hamburg 2011 1.523 0.709 2.149 0.251
Coinfection present in the nest 1.772 0.748 2.369 0.018

Notes: The full model was significantly different from a null model containing only the random factor “nest ID” (χ2 = 28.9, df = 6, P < 0.001). Multiple comparisons between levels of the factor “location/year” were performed using Tukeyʼs contrasts with single-step P-value adjustment. Significant P-values (P < 0.05) are shown in bold

Abbreviation: SE, standard error