Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;9(3):601. doi: 10.3390/cells9030601

Table 1.

Monoclonal Antibodies.

Biologicals and Drugs Disease Type Recruited (Evaluable) Efficacy Data AE Grade 3–4 [SAE] Trial Registration (Phase) Reference
Daratumumab (Anti-CD38)
Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (CASTOR) RRMM N = 498 ORR: 83.8% vs. 63.2%
≥VGPR: 62% vs. 29%
mPFS 16.7 vs. 7.1 mo
(DVd vs. Vd)
45.7% vs. 32.9%
(DVd vs. Vd)
NCT02136134 (3) [65,66]
Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone (POLLUX) RRMM N = 569 ORR: 92.9% vs. 76.4%
≥CR: 51.2% vs. 21%
mPFS NR vs. 17.4 mo
(DRd vs. Rd)
88.7% vs. 76.9%
(DRd vs. Rd)
NCT02076009 (3) [29,83]
Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 85 ORR: 84%, ≥VGPR 71% 77% [45%] NCT01998971 (1b) [84]
Daratumumab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 103 ORR: 60%
mPFS 8.8 mo
mOS 17.5 mo
78% NCT01998971 (1b) [85]
Atezolizumab (PD-L1), Daratumumab, Lenalidomide/Pomalidomide RRMM N = 24 ≥VGPR: 53% 49% (0–100%) NCT02431208 (1b) [85]
Selinexor, Daratumumab, and Dexamethasome RRMM N = 30 (28) ORR: 77%, ≥VGPR: 32.1% 66% [NA] (1b) [86]
Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone (LYRA) NDMM, RRMM N = 101 ORR 79% (ND), 71% (RR) VGPR: 44% (ND) 57% (RR) 12 mo PFS (87%), 12 mo OS (99%) 56% [21%] NCT02951819 (2) [87]
Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs. Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone (ALCYONE) NDMM N = 737 ORR: 90.9% vs. 73.9%, ≥VGPR 72.9% vs. 49.7%, mPFS NR vs. 19.1 (DVMP vs. VMP) 39.9% vs. 38.7% (D-VMP vs. VMP) [NR] NCT02195479 (3) [67]
Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone (CASSEOPEIA) NDMM N = 1085 CR: 39% vs. 26% (DVTd vs. VTd) 28% vs. 15% [NA] NCT02541383 (3) [68]
Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Daratumumab NDMM N = 40 (38) ORR: 95%, ≥VGPR: 58% 42% NCT03012880 (2) [88]
Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone vs. Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (GRIFFIN) NDMM N = 222 (16) ORR: 100%, ≥VGPR: 100% 88% NCT02874742 (2) [89]
Ixazomib, Daratumumab, Dexamethasone NDMM N = 32 (10) ORR: 70%, VGPR: 20% NA, 82% (unfit) 88% (frail) NTR6297 [90]
Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma (MAIA) NDMM N = 737 ORR: 92.9% vs. 81.3%, CR; 47.6% vs. 24.9% (DRd vs. Rd) 50% vs. 35.3% (62.9% vs. 62.7%) (DRd vs. Rd) NCT02252172 (3) [28]
Isatuximab (anti-CD38)
Isatuximab RRMM N = 84 ORR: 23.8% 58% (43%) NCT02514668 [91]
Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 307 ORR: 60.4% vs. 35.3%, ≥VGPR: 31.8% vs. 8.5%, mPFS 11.5 vs. 6.5 mo (IsaPd vs. Pd) 86.8% vs. 70.5% [NR} NCT02990338 (3) [92]
Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 34 NA 39.4% (8.8%) NCT02283775 (1b) [93]
Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone NDMM N = 22 (14) ORR: 93% 46%, 18% NCT02513186 [94]
MOR202 (anti-CD38)
MOR202 monotherapy RRMM N = 44 ORR: 28% 64% (0%) (1/2) [95]
MOR202, dexamethasone vs. MOR202, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. MOR202, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 56 ORR: 28% (+dex),
65% (+len/dex),
48% (+pom/dex)
NA NCT01421186 (1/2a) [96]
Anti-SLAMF7 antibody
Elotuzumab monotherapy RRMM N = 34 ORR: 0% (44.1%) (1) [76]
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 73 ORR: 84% 78% [NA] NCT00742560 (1b/2) [97]
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 646 ORR: 79% vs. 66%, 3-year PFS 41% vs. 27%, mOS 43.7 vs. 39.6 mo (ERd vs. Rd) 78% vs. 67% (ERd vs. Rd) NCT01239797 (3) [77]
Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 117 ORR: 53% vs. 26%, mPFS 10.3 vs. 4.7, mOS NR vs. 17.4 mo (EPd vs. Pd) 57% vs. 60% (EPd vs. Pd) NCT02654132 (3) [79]
Elotuzumab, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Thalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 40 ORR: 38%, mPFS 3.9 mo, mOS 16.3 mo 63% [NR] NCT01632150 (2) [98]
Elotuzumab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 152 (150) ORR: 66% vs. 63% VGPR: 36% vs. 27%, mPFS 9.7 vs. 6.9 mo (EVd vs. Vd) 71% vs. 60% [51% vs. 41] (EVd vs. Vd) NCT01478048 (2) [99]
Anti-IL6 antibody
Siltuximab (CNTO328), Bortezomib vs. Bortezomib RRMM N = 281 ORR: 55% vs. 47% mOS 30.8 vs. 36.8 mo (SB vs. B), no efficacy 49% vs. 29% (SB vs. B) NCT00401843 (2) [80]
Siltuximab, dexamethasone RRMM N = 55 (53) ORR 19% 36% [0] Phase 2 [81]
Siltuximab, Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisolone vs. Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisolone NDMM N = 106 CR: 27% vs. 22% (SVMP vs. VMP), did not meet primary endpoint 92% vs. 81% (SVMP vs. VMP) NCT00911859 (2) [100]
Siltuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone NDMM N = 11 ORR: 90.9%, ≥VGPR: 45.5% 63.6% [9.1%] NCT01531998 (1/2) [101]
Anti-CD138 antibody
Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) RRMM N = 29 (23) ≥SD: 50% Grade 1/2: 90% (1/2) [102]
Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062), lenalidomide RRMM N = 45 ORR: 83% Grade 1/2: 89% NCT01638936 (1/2a) [103]
Indatuzimab ravtansine, Lenalidomide or Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 64 (43) ORR: 77% Grade 1/2: 90% NCT01638936 (1/2a) [104]
Anti-CD56 antibody
Lorvotuzumab Mertansine (IMGN901) monotherapy RRMM N = 37 (35) ≥SD: 42.9%, PR: 5.7% 5.4% [0] NCT00346255 (1) [105]
Lorvotuzumab mertansine, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 44 (41) ORR: 59% NA NCT00991562 (1/2) [106]
Others
ACTR087, SEA-BCMA RRMM N = 2 50% (1/2) NCT03266692 (1) [107]
Tabalumab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone RRMM N = 220 ORR: 58.1% vs. 59.5% vs. 61.1%, mPFS 6.6,7.5 vs. 7.6 mo (tabalumab 100, tabalumab 300 vs. placebo) 37% [9.1%] NCT01602224 (2) [82]