Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;12:77. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00077

TABLE 2.

The contributions of different modalities.

Modalities ACC SEN SPE BACC AUC
MRI 74.5 ± 0.4% 54.8 ± 0.9% 85.0 ± 0.3% 69.9 ± 0.5% 79.2 ± 0.2%
FDG-PET 76.7 ± 0.4% 55.1 ± 0.8% 88.2 ± 0.5% 71.7 ± 0.4% 80.9 ± 0.2%
CSF 73.0 ± 0.5% 62.5 ± 1.0% 78.7 ± 0.5% 70.6 ± 0.6% 79.0 ± 0.3%
CSF + APOEϵ4 73.9 ± 0.4% 63.2 ± 0.7% 79.7 ± 0.6% 71.4 ± 0.4% 78.8 ± 0.3%
- MRI 81.3 ± 0.5% 67.0 ± 1.0% 89.0 ± 0.5% 78.0 ± 0.6% 86.8 ± 0.2%
- FDG-PET 81.0 ± 0.5% 67.2 ± 0.8% 88.4 ± 0.5% 77.8 ± 0.5% 86.7 ± 0.2%
- CSF 79.6 ± 0.6% 63.5 ± 1.2% 88.3 ± 0.5% 75.9 ± 0.7% 85.8 ± 0.2%
- APOEϵ4 83.2 ± 0.5% 69.8 ± 1.0% 90.4 ± 0.5% 80.1 ± 0.6% 88.7 ± 0.2%
- LASSO 83.5 ± 0.6% 69.0 ± 1.2% 91.2 ± 0.6% 80.1 ± 0.7% 88.8 ± 0.2%
All 84.7 ± 0.4% 72.7 ± 0.8% 91.2 ± 0.4% 81.9 ± 0.5% 88.8 ± 0.2%

“- modality” means the absence of the modality in experiments. In each cell, the two numbers represent the mean and standard deviation derived from 100 runs of validation. ACC, accuracy; APOE, apolipoprotein E; AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; BACC, balanced accuracy; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity.