Table 4.

Summary of results for all modeled scenarios in Kafue. Minimum and maximum percentages of how often the true population was captured in the 95% confidence interval are shown (the traditional CV approach dark shaded, the track count CV approach light shaded), as well as the minimum and maximum HRCIW (in bold). Full results are presented in Appendix S3

Site	Survey type	All duplicates removed	Intensity	CV approach	% true pop captured in 95% CI	HRCIW
Kafue	Regular	No	20	Track count	9.6%	28.4%
Kafue	Regular	No	80	Track count	20.9%	22.2%
Kafue	Regular	No	20	Traditional	51.4%	198.9%
Kafue	Regular	No	80	Traditional	96.0%	398.3%
Kafue	Regular	No	100	Traditional	98.2%	353.3%
Kafue	Replicated	No	20	Track count	16.1%	20.0%
Kafue	Replicated	No	80	Track count	4.7%	11.2%
Kafue	Replicated	No	100	Track count	5.3%	10.9%
Kafue	Replicated	No	20	Traditional	94.4%	94.2%
Kafue	Replicated	No	40	Traditional	99.3%	93.9%
Kafue	Replicated	No	60	Traditional	100.0%	94.3%
Kafue	Replicated	No	80	Traditional	100.0%	110.3%
Kafue	Replicated	No	100	Traditional	100.0%	108.2%
Kafue	Replicated	Yes	40	Track count	20.0%	16.5%
Kafue	Replicated	Yes	100	Track count	49.8%	12.9%
Kafue	Replicated	Yes	20	Traditional	93.6%	98.7%
Kafue	Replicated	Yes	80	Traditional	100.0%	128.0%
Kafue	Replicated	Yes	100	Traditional	100.0%	123.2%

Abbreviations: CV, coefficient of variance; HRCIW, half relative confidence interval width.