Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;9(3):632. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030632

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics at baseline by pain phenotypes *.

Characteristics Class 1
(n = 236)
Class 2
(n = 193)
Class 3
(n = 534)
p
C1 vs. C2
p
C1 vs. C3
p
C2 vs. C3
Age (years) 63.1 ± 7.7 64.4 ± 7.4 62.1 ± 7.2 0.217 0.242 0.001
Female sex, n (%) 152 (64) 66 (34) 267 (50) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 29.0 ± 5.4 29.4 ± 4.5 26.5 ± 3.9 0.869 <0.001 <0.001
Presence of emotional problems, n (%) 218 (92) 97 (50) 298 (56) <0.001 <0.001 0.040
Emotional problems, n (%) <0.001 <0.001 0.003
Not at all 18 (8) 96 (50) 236 (44)
Very little 94 (40) 69 (36) 185 (35)
Moderately 86 (36) 22 (11) 84 (16)
Quite a lot 35 (14) 5 (3) 27 (5)
Extremely 4 (2) 1 (1) 2 (0.4)
Education level, n (%) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
School only 160 (68) 77 (40) 296 (55)
Vocation training 74 (31) 77 (40) 164 (31)
University or higher 2 (1) 39 (20) 74 (14)
Presence of any comorbidity, n (%) 162 (69) 98 (51) 198 (37) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
WOMAC pain score (0–45) 8.6 ± 8.6 3.2 ± 5.6 1.5 ± 3.0 <0.001 <0.001 0.001
Number of painful sites (0–7) 5.8 ± 1.1 2.4 ± 1.5 2.2 ± 1.7 <0.001 <0.001 0.265
Presence of radiographic knee OA, n (%) 156 (66) 131 (67) 290 (54) 0.791 0.004 0.004
Knee structural pathology, n (%)
Cartilage defects 88 (37) 172 (89) 60 (11) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
BMLs 82 (35) 161 (83) 101 (19) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Effusion-synovitis 102 (43) 125 (65) 184 (34) <0.001 0.026 <0.001

* Values are the Mean ± SD except for percentages and pain phenotypes (Classes) were identified from latent class analysis. p values are from post hoc testing for comparisons between classes determined by ANOVA or logistic regression (where appropriate); BMI body mass index; WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; OA osteoarthritis; BMLs bone marrow lesions. This table has been published elsewhere [16] and permission to use has been obtained.