Aviles 1996.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Not placebo‐controlled, not blinded, unclear sponsorship, single‐center trial | |
Participants | Adults; hematologic tumors; ANC < 0.1 x 109/L | |
Interventions | G‐CSF (not specified) 5 mcg/kg SC ATB: Amikacin plus Ceftazidime |
|
Outcomes | Overall mortality Infection‐related mortality | |
Notes | Hospital discharge criteria: not reported Duration of grade IV neutropenia reported as days to absolute granulocyte recovery to > 0.5 x 109/L |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | We were not able to assess the adequacy of method of sequence generation based on the information provided in the article |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed envelopes were used |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | There was no blinding |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | There was no blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | There was no blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | ITT analysis was not used, withdrawals are described |
Other bias | High risk | Prespecified values of sample size, alpha and beta errors were not provided |