Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;2014(10):CD003039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003039.pub2

Aviles 1996.

Study characteristics
Methods Not placebo‐controlled, not blinded, unclear sponsorship, single‐center trial
Participants Adults; hematologic tumors; ANC < 0.1 x 109/L
Interventions G‐CSF (not specified) 5 mcg/kg SC
ATB: Amikacin plus Ceftazidime
Outcomes Overall mortality
Infection‐related mortality
Notes Hospital discharge criteria: not reported
Duration of grade IV neutropenia reported as days to absolute granulocyte recovery to > 0.5 x 109/L
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk We were not able to assess the adequacy of method of sequence generation based on the information provided in the article
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes were used
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes High risk There was no blinding
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk There was no blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk There was no blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk ITT analysis was not used, withdrawals are described
Other bias High risk Prespecified values of sample size, alpha and beta errors were not provided