Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):845. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030845

Table 2.

Comparisons for outcome measurements between both treatment groups.

Outcome Measurements Chemical Matricectomy with Phenol Aesthetic Reconstruction Group p-Value
Mean ± SD (95% CI)
Median (IR)
Mean ± SD (95% CI)
Median (IR)
Healing time (days) 21.3 ± 3.1 (20.20–22.39)
20,5 (11)
8.2 ± 1.4 (7.92–8.55)
8 (7)
<0.001 *
Recurrence rate 1 (2.8%) ** 2 (1.52%) ** 0.98 ***
Post-surgical bleeding (Mild = 1; moderate = 2; abundant = 3) 1.67 ± 0.58 (1.48–1.86)
2 (1)
1.65 ± 0.62 (1.51–1.79)
2 (1)
0.91 *
Post-surgical pain at 1st day (VAS) 1.9 ± 1.8 (1.31–2.49)
1.5 (3)
2.6 ± 2.5 (2.04–3.16)
2 (4)
0.41 *
Post-surgical pain at 2nd day (VAS) 1.2 ± 1.4 (0.74–1.66)
1 (2)
1.9 ± 2.2 (1.41–2.39)
1 (4)
0.28 *
Post-surgical pain at 3rd day (VAS) 0.8 ± 1.2 (0.41–1.19)
0 (1)
1 ± 1.3 (0.71–1.29)
1 (2)
0.33 *
Post-surgical inflammation (mm; digital circumference) 0.2 ± 0.1(0.17–0.23)
0.2
0.3 ± 0.3 (0.23–0.37)
0.3
0.72 *
Infection rate 2 (5.6%) ** 2 (1.5%) ** 0.82 ***

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analogue scale. * Mann–Whitney U test. Statistically significant differences were set at p < 0.05 with a 95% CI. ** Qualitative variable; frequencies (percentage). *** Yates’ Chi-square test.