Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;10:6044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63219-w

Table 1.

The patient’s demographic data.

Conventional planning group (n = 22) Planning with 3D printing group (n = 20) P-value
Gender, n (%) 0.461a
Male 13 (59.09) 14 (70.00)
Female 9 (40.91) 6 (30.00)
BMI (kg/m2), M ± SD 25.02 ± 1.72 24.96 ± 2.03 0.929b
Age (year), M ± SD 43.00 ± 7.86 42.85 ± 7.71 0.95b
Side of injury, n (%) 0.721a
Right 12 (54.55) 12 (60.00)
Left 10 (45.45) 8 (40.00)
Cause of imjury, n (%) 0.985a
Falling from height 9 (40.91) 8 (40.00)
Traffic accident 8 (36.36) 7 (35.00)
Other 5 (22.73) 5 (25.00)
Time from admission to hospital to surgery (day), M ± SD 26.91 ± 5.65 24.65 ± 4.39 0.207c
Schatzker classification, n (%) 0.647a
IV 9 (40.91) 6 (30.00)
V 6 (27.27) 8 (40.00)
VI 7 (31.82) 6 (30.00)
No. of post. column plate, n (%) 0.382a
0 6 (27.27) 8 (40.00)
1 16 (72.73) 12 (60.00)
No. of med. column plate, n (%) 1 22 (100) 20 (100) n/a
No. of lat. column plate, n (%) 0.461a
0 9 (40.91) 6 (30.00)
1 13 (59.09) 14 (70.00)
Approach method, n (%) 0.382a
Antero-middle 6 (27.27) 8 (40.00)
Antero-middle + posteromedial 16 (72.73) 12 (60.00)
Follow-up time (month), M ± SD 23.45 ± 8.28 25.40 ± 6.87 0.308c

achi-squared test, bIndependent t test, cMann-Whitney test. M ± SD: mean ± standard deviation; n/a: not applicable; post.: posterior; med.: medial; lat.: lateral; No.: number; n: patient number.