Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;62(2):218–226. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218

Table 2. Effects of different farrowing facilities on body weight, backfat thickness, feed intake and weaning to estrus interval in primiparous sows.

Items CON LFP SEM p-value
Sow body weight (kg)
 Gestation (d 105) 229.25 227.82 3.86 0.810
 Lactation (d 1) 208.03 206.80 3.73 0.828
 Weaning (d 28) 200.53 200.31 4.62 0.974
 G to L change (-) 21.23 21.02 1.31 0.912
 L to W change (-) 7.50 6.49 2.07 0.734
Sow backfat thickness (mm)
 Gestation (d 105) 26.27 28.23 0.98 0.171
 Lactation (d 1) 25.68 27.50 1.08 0.251
 Weaning (d 28) 21.64 23.86 0.82 0.070
 G to L change (-) 0.59 0.73 0.21 0.657
 L to W change (-) 4.05 3.64 1.03 0.781
Daily feed intake (kg/d) 4.00 4.16 0.14 0.475
Weaning to estrus interval (d) 5.59 5.45 0.20 0.622

Data represents means based on eleven replicates primiparous sows per treatment.

CON, conventional farrowing facilities; LFP, loosed farrowing pens; SEM, standard error of means; G, gestation; L, lactation; W, weaning.