Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;10(3):84. doi: 10.3390/metabo10030084

Table A1.

Discriminative peaks from three PLS-Da models with peak in order of first dimension retention time on non-polar column (RT Dim 1) with addition of second dimension retention time on mid-polar column (RT Dim 2).

Peak RT Dim 1 RT Dim 2 Mass Discrimination Up or Down
37 213.065 1.50373 43 F H vs N D
61 252.986 1.54448 87 F H vs N D
75 266.896 1.69866 84 F H vs N D
82 278.881 1.52216 87 F H vs N D
94 290.867 1.5497 87 F H vs N D
122 311.842 1.70207 61 F H vs N D
146 347.798 2.07133 69 F H vs N U
161 368.059 1.68569 59 F H vs N D
177 381.986 2.01085 59 F H vs N D
199 410.852 1.84624 45 F H vs N U
211 422.849 2.59792 43 F H vs N D
221 431.698 2.17416 55 F H vs N U
234 446.54 1.94374 56 F H vs N U
235 445.611 2.1115 45 F H vs N D
251 470.651 1.85195 43 F H vs N D
299 536.554 1.81135 45 F H vs N D
456 713.831 1.96898 61 F H vs N D
505 773.287 2.35098 83 F H vs N U
531 794.262 2.88303 96 F H vs N D
560 824.226 1.74228 57 F H vs N U
562 823.532 1.91573 103 H vs F N U
638 878.161 2.06622 57 F H vs N U
662 896.75 2.4186 81 F H vs N U
747 967.754 2.2181 146 F H vs N U
760 979.795 2.2298 91 H vs F N U
783 1001.01 0.424779 85 F H vs N U
794 1007.01 2.33448 70 F H vs N U
799 1010 2.30056 99 F H vs N U
841 1038.33 2.20129 59 F H vs N U
916 1084.9 1.57542 93 H vs F N D
920 1084.97 1.65668 81 F H vs N U
957 1111.88 2.04592 57 F H vs N U
965 1118.6 1.60533 267 F H vs N D
979 1123.87 2.38479 81 F H vs N U
1021 1146.78 2.91127 87 F H vs N D
1037 1150.08 2.73321 99 F H vs N U
1134 1225.92 0.285066 85 F H vs N U
1166 1240.73 2.2519 113 F H vs N U
1185 1252.26 1.75714 207 H vs F N U
1206 1263.01 2.21667 101 F H vs N D
1296 1336.58 2.01166 57 F H vs N U
1313 1354.66 2.32802 81 F H vs N U
1367 1411.52 1.83798 59 F H vs N U
1387 1422.39 1.84604 59 F H vs N U
1405 1433.16 0.157468 113 H vs F N U
1437 1458.51 1.54951 163 F H vs N U
1449 1462.46 1.9767 58 F H vs N U
1450 1462.46 2.1945 127 F H vs N U
1457 1465.46 2.42029 131 F H vs N U
1497 1507.46 2.15058 59 H vs F N U
1521 1525.41 1.82177 207 H vs F N U
1553 1549.82 2.17105 59 F H vs N D
1562 1555.15 1.69778 281 H vs F N U
1587 1570.33 2.26863 81 F H vs N U
1599 1581.97 1.54985 73 H vs F N U
1616 1591.93 1.74071 59 F H vs N U
1656 1628.35 0.0582741 84 F H vs N U
1672 1639.32 1.84592 59 F H vs N U
1673 1638.78 2.08221 133 H vs F N U
1735 1687.01 1.5716 71 F vs H N U
1765 1711.21 1.71539 69 F vs H N U
1776 1717.15 1.82356 59 F H vs N U
1780 1723.15 1.93293 114 F H vs N U
1810 1741.73 2.28162 59 F H vs N D
1842 1762.1 1.84815 109 H vs F N U
1850 1767.88 2.30028 87 F H vs N D
1866 1777.23 2.70362 87 F H vs N D
1911 1804.52 1.54262 57 H vs F N U
2011 1848.74 1.93918 95 F H vs N U
2019 1848.07 1.73778 97 H vs F N D
2050 1867.03 1.65334 92 H vs F N U
2073 1875.98 2.19588 177 F H vs N U
2088 1884.55 1.7368 70 F vs H N U
2107 1893.49 1.5439 70 F vs H N U
2127 1902.93 1.91097 72 F H vs N U
2149 1913.33 1.96941 58 H vs F N U
2209 1944.88 1.68335 191 F H vs N D
2262 1974.91 1.79818 59 H vs F N U
2277 1980.84 1.72275 57 F H vs N U
2348 2013.6 2.31272 87 F H vs N D
2360 2022.79 2.48686 100 F H vs N D
2412 2046.83 1.84665 113 F H vs N U
2490 2091.72 1.88072 114 F H vs N U
2529 2112.93 1.62908 119 H vs F N D
2578 2139.68 1.87183 150 F vs H N U
2608 2156.88 1.76811 70 H vs F N D
2625 2165.99 1.58243 91 F H vs N U
2756 2220.55 1.86757 58 F H vs N U
3100 2391.31 2.21692 219 F H vs N U
3190 2457.32 1.60417 151 H vs F N U
3231 2493.19 1.84005 69 F vs H N U
3234 2496.29 1.60178 151 H vs F N U
3437 2739.03 1.59881 151 H vs F N U
3489 2830.62 1.62092 149 H vs F N U

Note: “Mass” corresponds to the unique ion in the deconvoluted EI spectrum determined by the LECO ChromaToF software. “Discrimination” indicates significance from either of Happy (H) and Fear (F), or both, over Neutral (N) associated with donor peaks being up (U) or down (D) for Happy/Fearful.