Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;8(3):322. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030322

Table 3.

Impact of direct-fed microbials (DFM) and phytobiotic feed additives on bacterial growth after 4 h incubation of inoculated cecal samples with the donor (E. coli ESBL10682) and recipient (Salmonella Typhimurium L1219-R32) strains [log10(cfu/mL)].

Trial Group E. coli
ESBL10682
Salmonella Typhimurium
L1219-R32
Indigenous,
SXT Resistant Enterobacteriaceae 2
Control 6.86 ± 0.48 7.10 ± 0.37 5.93 ± 0.61 abe
LS 6.81 ± 0.27 7.04 ± 0.39 5.92 ± 0.52 be
LA 6.90 ± 0.45 6.92 ± 0.47 5.49 ± 0.42 abcd
Formulation C 6.94 ± 0.31 7.06 ± 0.42 5.50 ± 0.52 abcd
Formulation L 6.91 ± 0.28 7.36 ± 0.24 6.12 ± 0.80 e
LS + C 6.76 ± 0.54 7.21 ± 0.31 5.85 ± 0.49 abde
LS + L 6.56 ± 0.71 7.14 ± 0.32 5.40 ± 0.64 abcd
LA + C 6.49 ± 0.73 7.10 ± 0.37 5.45 ± 0.68 abcd
LA + L 6.59 ± 0.53 7.14 ± 0.24 6.02 ± 0.51 e
p 1 0.317 0.183 0.002

1 Significant differences were determined using the Kruskal–Wallis test, 2 different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney test) in the abundance of indigenous, SXT resistant Enterobacteriaceae after 4 h incubation between trial groups.