Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 19;17(6):2049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062049

Table 4.

The correlation between PHI and access to healthcare 1.

Ref. ID Study Period PHI Indicator Type of Healthcare Utilised Sample Correlation
[56] 2004 Enrolment Generic healthcare Mixed Neutral
[58] 2008 Enrolment Generic healthcare Mixed Positive 2
[57] 2008 Enrolment Generic healthcare Mixed/urban/rural Positive/Neutral 3
[60] 2000, 2004 Enrolment Inpatient care Mixed Positive 4
Preventative care Positive
[59] 2007, 2008 Enrolment Inpatient care Urban Positive
Outpatient care Neutral
[61] Enrolment Inpatient care Rural-to-urban migrants Neutral
2007–2010 Outpatient care Neutral
Preventative care Positive
[66] 2004, 2006, 2009 Enrolment Outpatient care Rural Negative
Preventative care Positive
[64] 2011, 2013 Enrolment Outpatient care Mixed Positive/Neutral 5
[62] 2006–2010 Provincial PHI premium income over GDP Inpatient care (the average length of hospitalisation) Mixed Neutral
[63] 2003 Percentage of PHI enrolees in a county Inpatient care (the number of admissions per 1000 in 52 weeks) Rural Neutral
Outpatient care (the number of visits per 1000 in 2 weeks) Positive

1 If unspecified, all comparisons are between enrolees and non-enrolees of PHI, and all presented positive or negative correlations passed the significance test, otherwise neutral correlation was reported. 2 Referring to the NCMS (New Cooperative Medical Scheme). 3 For the whole and the urban population, not for the rural population. 4 The positive relationship exists between 2000 and 2004 but disappears between 2006 and 2009. 5 Positive for PHI as primary health insurance only; no correlation for complementary PHI.