Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):507. doi: 10.3390/ani10030507

Table 3.

Effect of probiotic diet supplementation on growth performance and feed efficiency in broiler chicks challenged with C. perfringens.

Treatments
Parameters NC PC M CL S CL + S G SEM Sig.
IBW (g) 36.8 36.7 36.9 36.8 36.8 36.9 36.8 0.04 NS
FBW (g) 1829.3 a 1593.3 b 1807.4 a 1827.0 a 1824.3 a 1823.1 a 1798.9 a 2.121 ***
FI (g) 2284.7 2325.6 2366.7 2353.2 2382.6 2379.9 2404.4 2.865 NS
BWG (g) 1424.6 a 1134.0 b 1384.3 a 1379.0 a 1418.8 a 1386.5 a 1350.8 a 1.961 ***
FCR (g: g) 1.60 c 2.05 a 1.71 b,c 1.71 b,c 1.68 b,c 1.72 b 1.78 b 0.03 ***
PEF 326.2 a 215.6 c 301.5 a,b 305.0 a,b 310.0 a,b 307.6 a,b 288.5 b 2.76 ***
SR (%) 100.0 a 96.3 b 98.1 a 98.1 a 98.1 a 98.1 a 98.1 a 0.30 ***

NC, negative control group; PC, positive control group; M, Maxus supplemented group; CL, CloStat supplemented group; S, Sangrovit Extra supplemented group; CL+S, CloStat+Sangrovit Extra supplemented group; G, Gallipro Tech supplemented group. IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; FI, feed intake; BWG, body weight gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio; PEF, protein efficiency ratio; SR, survival rate. SEM, mean values of standard error. Mean values of three replicates with deferent letter (a, b, c) in the same column are significantly deferent (p < 0.05). Sig., significance; N.S, non-significance; ***, significant at 0.001.