Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 21;10(3):118. doi: 10.3390/metabo10030118

Table 4.

Comparison of mode rank based on different model selection criteria.

Models AICc Rank AIC Rank BIC Rank
Expert-derived model −401.7597 1 −421.3026 1 −385.5009 1
7_G1R1A2U3 −384.3075 2 −413.1825 2 −371.4139 2
7_G2R1A1U3_g5 −381.2868 3 −410.1618 3 −368.3932 3
7_G1R2A1U3_r3 −379.2657 4 −408.1407 4 −366.3720 4
7_G1R2A1U3_r4 −378.8969 5 −407.7719 5 −366.0033 5
7_G2R1A1U3_g4 −375.9538 6 −404.8288 6 −363.0601 6
9_G2R2A2U3_r2r3_g5 −254.4087 37 −312.5625 36 −258.8599 37
9_G2R2A2U3_r2r3_g3 −248.2277 38 −306.3815 38 −252.6789 38
9_G2R2A2U3_r2r3_g2 −242.9984 39 −301.1522 39 −247.4497 39
9_G2R2A2U3_r2r3_g1 −242.4110 40 −300.5648 40 −246.8623 40
7_G0R3A1U3_g3r2r3_g6r5_r4 −226.7271 41 −255.6021 41 −213.8334 41

Dataset: FT-ICR-MS (combined); Optimization method: SAGA-optimize (25,000 steps); Objective function: Absolute difference. Bolded line indicates the start of incorrect selection of the expert-derived model.