Table 4.
Sensory evaluation scores of citrus wines.
Fermentations | Clarity | Aroma (Fruity, Floral) | Taste | Taste Lasting | Overall Acceptability | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/3 | /6 | /6 | /3 | /2 | /20 | |
Sc-Hu | 2.83 ± 0.41 ** | 4.16 ± 0.41 ** | 3.83 ± 0.41 ** | 1.83 ± 0.41 ** | 1.33 ± 0.52 * | 14.00 ± 0.63 ** |
Sc-Td | 2.16 ± 0.41 ** | 3.67 ± 0.52 ** | 3.83 ± 0.41 ** | 2.00 ± 0.00 ** | 1.33 ± 0.52 * | 13.00 ± 0.63 ** |
Sc-Hop | 2.5 ± 0.55 ** | 4.5 ± 0.55 ** | 4.33 ± 0.52 ** | 2.00 ± 0.00 ** | 1.67 ± 0.52 ** | 15.00 ± 0.67 ** |
Sc | 1.50 ± 0.55 | 2.83 ± 0.41 | 2.67 ± 0.52 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 9.00 ± 0.89 |
Data show the mean value of the scores from 9 panelists, and the significant differences were with respect to the control Sc. ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Sc-Hu, S. cerevisiae/H. uvarum co-fermentation; Sc-Td, S. cerevisiae/T. delbrueckii co-fermentation; Sc-Hop, S. cerevisiae/H. opuntiae co-fermentation; Sc, S. cerevisiae fermentation.