Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;8(3):323. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030323

Table 4.

Sensory evaluation scores of citrus wines.

Fermentations Clarity Aroma (Fruity, Floral) Taste Taste Lasting Overall Acceptability Total
/3 /6 /6 /3 /2 /20
Sc-Hu 2.83 ± 0.41 ** 4.16 ± 0.41 ** 3.83 ± 0.41 ** 1.83 ± 0.41 ** 1.33 ± 0.52 * 14.00 ± 0.63 **
Sc-Td 2.16 ± 0.41 ** 3.67 ± 0.52 ** 3.83 ± 0.41 ** 2.00 ± 0.00 ** 1.33 ± 0.52 * 13.00 ± 0.63 **
Sc-Hop 2.5 ± 0.55 ** 4.5 ± 0.55 ** 4.33 ± 0.52 ** 2.00 ± 0.00 ** 1.67 ± 0.52 ** 15.00 ± 0.67 **
Sc 1.50 ± 0.55 2.83 ± 0.41 2.67 ± 0.52 1.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 9.00 ± 0.89

Data show the mean value of the scores from 9 panelists, and the significant differences were with respect to the control Sc. ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Sc-Hu, S. cerevisiae/H. uvarum co-fermentation; Sc-Td, S. cerevisiae/T. delbrueckii co-fermentation; Sc-Hop, S. cerevisiae/H. opuntiae co-fermentation; Sc, S. cerevisiae fermentation.