Table 3.
Model | Total Effect | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | Partial Standardized Indirect Effect | Completely Standardized Indirect Effect | Bootstrapping 95% CI |
Sobel Test | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
z | sign | |||||||
Model 1 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.09 | (0.005, 0.106) | 2.11 | p < 0.05 |
Model 2 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.08 | (–0.031, 0.117) | 1.29 | p = 0.20 |
Model 3 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | (0.001, 0.049) | - | |
Model 4 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (–0.010, 0.012) | - |
Note: Model 1 = the relationship between predisposition to change and job satisfaction, mediated by workplace relational civility part B; Model 2 = the relationship between predisposition to change and job satisfaction, mediated by insight orientation; Model 3 = the relationship between predisposition to change and job satisfaction, mediated by both insight orientation and workplace relational civility part B; Model 4: the relationship between predisposition to change and job satisfaction, mediated by both workplace relational civility part B and insight orientation.