Table 2.
Experiment 3 | Control Group * | EMF Group * | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of Tail Lifts | Ratio a | No. of Increase b | No. of Tail Lifts | Ratio a | No. of Increase b | |
Pre-test baseline | 5.9 ± 6.3 | 1 | 0 | 4.0 ± 4.7 | 1 | 0 |
Test-day values | ||||||
Day 1 | 3.8 ± 4.1 | 0.6 | −2.2 ± 6.1 | 4.1 ± 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 ± 5.9 |
Day 2 | 7.1 ± 9.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 ± 8.9 | 7.1 ± 9.9 | 1.8 | 3.1 ± 10.6 |
Day 3 | 7.4 ± 5.7 | 1.2 | 1.5 ± 5.3 | 7.9 ± 9.0 | 2.0 | 3.9 ± 10.4 |
Day 4 | 4.3 ± 2.8 | 0.7 | −1.7 ± 6.2 | 8.8 ± 11.2 | 2.2 | 4.8 ± 10.5 |
Day 5 | 4.9 ± 6.8 | 0.8 | −1.6 ± 9.2 | 10.6 ± 11.8 | 2.6 | 7.1 ± 10.1 |
Days 1–5 combined | 5.5 ± 5.9 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | −0.5 ± 7.1 | 7.6 ± 9.3 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 9.4 |
* Two sets of data (that for EMF grouping followed by control grouping and that for control grouping followed by EMF grouping) were merged and underwent analysis. a Ratio = number of tail lifts divided by the baseline number of tail lifts (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.6 in the control and EMF groups, respectively; n = 8 each, P = 0.02). b Increase in the number of tail lifts = test-day value minus baseline value (−0.5 ± 7.1 vs. 3.7 ± 9.4 in the control and EMF groups, respectively; n = 8 each, p = 0.02).