Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 15;10(3):489. doi: 10.3390/ani10030489

Table 2.

Experiment 3 results (cross-over study; filtering out light of wavelengths < 380 nm; control group vs. EMF group, n = 8 each): average number of tail lifts, ratio of the number of tail lifts (test-day values divided by baseline values), and increase in the number of tail lifts (test-day values minus baseline values; data shown are mean ± SD per individual per day).

Experiment 3 Control Group * EMF Group *
No. of Tail Lifts Ratio a No. of Increase b No. of Tail Lifts Ratio a No. of Increase b
Pre-test baseline 5.9 ± 6.3 1 0 4.0 ± 4.7 1 0
Test-day values
Day 1 3.8 ± 4.1 0.6 −2.2 ± 6.1 4.1 ± 4.1 1.0 0.1 ± 5.9
Day 2 7.1 ± 9.1 1.2 1.2 ± 8.9 7.1 ± 9.9 1.8 3.1 ± 10.6
Day 3 7.4 ± 5.7 1.2 1.5 ± 5.3 7.9 ± 9.0 2.0 3.9 ± 10.4
Day 4 4.3 ± 2.8 0.7 −1.7 ± 6.2 8.8 ± 11.2 2.2 4.8 ± 10.5
Day 5 4.9 ± 6.8 0.8 −1.6 ± 9.2 10.6 ± 11.8 2.6 7.1 ± 10.1
Days 1–5 combined 5.5 ± 5.9 0.9 ± 0.3 −0.5 ± 7.1 7.6 ± 9.3 1.9 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 9.4

* Two sets of data (that for EMF grouping followed by control grouping and that for control grouping followed by EMF grouping) were merged and underwent analysis. a Ratio = number of tail lifts divided by the baseline number of tail lifts (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.6 in the control and EMF groups, respectively; n = 8 each, P = 0.02). b Increase in the number of tail lifts = test-day value minus baseline value (−0.5 ± 7.1 vs. 3.7 ± 9.4 in the control and EMF groups, respectively; n = 8 each, p = 0.02).