Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Mach Learn Med Imaging. 2019 Oct 10;11861:382–390. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32692-0_44

Table 1:

NY and UM Classification Results

Model NY (184 subjects, 42.3% ASD) UM (143 subjects, 46.2% ASD)
Mean (Std) ACC (%) Mean (Std) TPR (%) Mean (Std) TNR (%) AUC Mean (Std) ACC (%) Mean (Std) TPR (%) Mean (Std) TNR (%) AUC
LSTM-S [7] 69.5 (11.0) 52.4 (26.5) 83.1 (12.0) 0.720 69.8 (11.4) 56.7 (24.2) 74.0 (25.3) 0.740
FC-SVM [1] 70.7 (8.2) 54.8 (21.5) 83.2 (11.8) 0.783 69.2 (12.0) 46.7 (18.9) 89.8 (12.8) 0.713
HMM [11] 70.6 (6.6) 61.6 66.7 0.712 73.4 (10.5) 68.5 76.9 0.738
DTL [13] - - - - 67.2 68.9 67.6 0.67
LSTM-D 70.7 (11.0) 48.9 (27.1) 86.7 (16.1) 0.746 67.0 (12.0) 52.9 (22.2) 78.6 (25.6) 0.738
LSTM-H 68.0 (7.7) 52.0 (19.8) 80.1 (10.1) 0.779 69.2 (11.4) 57.9 (14.5) 78.7 (18.1) 0.777
LSTM-DG 72.2 (14.7) 57.4 (25.5) 84.1 (12.2) 0.772 74.8 (10.0) 60.8 (12.8) 85.6 (14.5) 0.774