Table 1.
Ki ± S.E.M. (nM) | Selectivity Ratio | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compounds | [3H]DAMGO (μ) 1 | [3H]IleDelt II (δ) 1 | [3H]U-69593 (κ) 2 | δ/μ | κ/μ | δ/κ |
14-OMeC6SU | 3.37 ± 0.48 ** (n = 6) |
345.52 ± 132.52 (n = 5) |
245.57 ± 215.01 (n = 5) |
102.5 | 72.9 | 1.4 |
C6SU | 96.91 ± 20.3 * (n = 5) |
968.28 ± 471.38 (n = 6) |
N.D.3 (n = 5) |
9.9 | - | - |
Codeine | 736.74 ± 319.63 (n = 4) |
N.D. 4 (n = 4) |
N.D. 4 (n = 4) |
- | - | - |
Morphine 5 | 0.76 ± 0.08 (n = 7) |
114.21 ± 44.83 (n = 6) |
N.D. 4 (n = 4) |
150.3 | - | - |
Homologous ligand6 | 0.59 ± 0.12 (n = 5) |
3.81 ± 0.88 (n = 6) |
5.51 ± 0.97 (n = 5) |
- | - | - |
1 performed in rat brain membrane homogenates; 2 performed in guinea pig brain membrane homogenates; 3 the compound did not inhibit total specific radioligand binding (100%) to 50%, thus the Ki value cannot be interpreted (N.D. not determined); 4 the compound did not alter significantly (One-sample t test) the total specific radioligand binding (100%), thus the Ki value cannot be interpreted (N.D. not determined); 5 adopted from [23]; 6 indicates the unlabeled form of the radioligands and represent a control for the assay (μ: DAMGO δ: IleDelt II, κ: U-69593); * compared to codeine (One-way ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparison test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001).