Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2019 Mar 12;82(1):174–188. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27707

Table 2:

Regional cartilage and meniscus T2 analysis for the ten testing patient datasets using the different reconstruction methods at acceleration rate R=5 and R=8. MANTIS provided mean T2 values that agree well with the reference T2 values for the patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilage, superficial and deep half cartilage, and meniscus.

Methods T2 values (ms) (mean ± SD) at R=5 T2 values (ms) (mean ± SD) at R=8
Patellar Femoral Tibial Superficial Deep Meniscus Patellar Femoral Tibial Superficial Deep Meniscus
GLR 55.0 ± 3.2 54.7 ± 2.8 48.7 ± 5.9 66.0 ± 3.8 39.6 ± 2.3 37.3 ± 2.8 57.4 ± 3.1 56.8 ± 2.5 49.6 ± 5.5 68.2 ± 3.5 40.9 ± 2.1 38.0 ± 3.4
LLR 52.4 ± 3.4 53.1 ± 2.8 47.1 ± 6.2 63.6 ± 3.9 38.2 ± 2.3 34.7 ± 3.1 52.7 ± 3.3 53.5 ± 2.8 47.4 ± 6.1 64.0 ± 3.9 38.4 ± 2.3 34.9 ± 3.1
k-t SLR 48.1 ± 3.2 52.2 ± 4.2 44.7 ± 8.3 55.8 ± 4.3 33.5 ± 2.6 33.6 ± 3.3 55.0 ± 5.5 54.0 ± 4.0 44.1 ± 8.1 58.7 ± 4.3 35.2 ± 2.6 35.0 ± 3.1
ALOHA 44.3 ± 3.2 48.9 ± 3.7 43.2 ± 6.8 54.5 ± 4.1 32.7 ± 2.5 30.9 ± 3.5 48.8 ± 4.1 49.2 ± 3.3 42.0 ± 7.7 55.8 ± 4.4 33.5 ± 2.7 31.7 ± 3.1
U-Net Imaging + T2 Fitting 42.3 ± 3.4 47.3 ± 3.5 42.4 ± 6.2 53.9 ± 4.1 31.3 ± 1.6 25.8 ± 4.1 44.9 ± 3.7 47.4 ± 3.4 41.7 ± 6.5 54.5 ± 4.2 32.7 ± 2.5 28.8 ± 4.0
U-Net Mapping 41.1 ± 3.7 45.9 ± 3.2 41.5 ± 6.1 53.5 ± 4.4 32.1 ± 2.7 28.0 ± 3.9 42.6 ± 4.4 44.5 ± 3.4 39.1 ± 7.4 52.9 ± 5.0 31.7 ± 3.0 28.4 ± 3.9
MANTIS 40.4 ± 3.7 45.6 ± 3.4 41.7 ± 5.6 53.2 ± 4.1 31.9 ± 2.4 28.3 ± 4.0 41.0 ± 3.9 45.5 ± 3.6 41.1 ± 5.8 53.3 ± 4.3 32.0 ± 2.8 28.7 ± 4.5
Reference 39.6 ± 3.5 46.0 ± 3.4 42.5 ± 5.5 53.4 ± 3.8 32.0 ± 2.3 27.5 ± 4.0 39.6 ± 3.5 46.0 ± 3.4 42.5 ± 5.5 53.4 ± 3.8 32.0 ± 2.3 27.5 ± 4.0