Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;8:e8914. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8914

Table 4. Prediction of protein-coding genes.

Average length (bp)
Methods Gene number Exons per gene Gene CDS Exon Intron
De novo Augustus 18,318 8.14 16,402.87 1,402.91 172.29 2,099.99
GlimmerHMM 172,168 2.90 5,695.00 474.06 163.45 2,747.47
SNAP 61,271 6.31 29,996.61 809.23 128.21 5,495.13
Geneid 38,214 5.48 20,392.89 1,006.18 183.58 4,326.65
Genscan 43,335 7.61 19,762.90 1,294.69 170.05 2,792.52
Homologous comparison Taeniopygia guttata 26,141 5.64 13,827.51 1,049.69 186.24 2,756.00
Anas platyrhynchos 36,335 4.65 9,142.51 930.19 199.91 2,248.05
Gallus gallus 25,943 6.03 13,297.66 1,171.56 194.16 2,408.92
Columba livia 36,315 4.71 9,177.85 913.73 194.05 2,228.25
Anser cygnoides 34,171 5.14 10,493.05 1,004.18 195.43 2,292.94
Pseudopodoces humilis 15,498 9.06 21,225.26 1,648.10 181.90 2,428.77
RNA-seq Cufflinks 48,064 7.93 24,121.46 3,494.75 440.7 2,976.44
PASA 65,640 6.78 15,650.31 1,168.16 172.35 2,506.53
EVM 24,169 7.12 16,340.12 1,225.82 172.14 2,469.26
PASA-update 24,010 7.20 17,772.08 1,249.46 173.43 2,663.08
Final set 16,428 9.88 25,274.02 1,641.91 166.26 2,662.69