Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;8:e8905. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8905

Figure 2. Fungal composition of 18 plant and soil samples under an A. macrocephala (AM) continuous cropping system.

Figure 2

Each plant and soil samples (18 samples) were randomly divided into three subsamples (18 × 3), and were analyzed using the average data of their subsamples, respectively. The “core fungi” of A. macrocephala (A) and soil (B). The relative abundance at order level of 18 plant and soil samples (C), and the dominant genera of six soil samples (D), different letters above the bars in one genus denote significant differences at P < 0.01. One-year fallow soil (FS_1), 2-year fallow soil (FS_2), 1-year healthy rhizosphere soil (RS_H1), 2-year healthy rhizospheric soil (RS_H2), 2-year root-rot diseased rhizospheric soil (RS_D), blank control soil (no A. macrocephala was planted) (S_CK), 1-year-old healthy root/stem/leaf/tuber (R/S/L/T_H1), 2-year-old healthy root/stem/leaf/tuber (R/S/L/T_H2), 2-year-old root-rot diseased root/stem/leaf/tuber (R/S/L/T_D).