Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;41(4):607–611. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6469

Table 2:

Variables potentially associated with missing LVO at initial CTA evaluation; results of univariate logistic regression analysisa

Variables Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Interpreter
 Non-neuroradiologists (n = 33) vs neuroradiologists (n = 27) 7.14 (1.43–35.57) .02
 Senior residents (n = 24) vs neuroradiologists (n = 27) 1.79 (0.27–11.71) .55
 Senior residents (n = 24) vs non-neuroradiologists (n = 33) 0.25 (0.06–1.02) .05
Time of CTA interpretation, on-call hours (n = 40) vs office hours (n = 44) 1.89 (0.63–5.70) .26
Reporting of lateralizing symptoms/signs or suspected location of stroke on the request form for CTA; yes (n = 58) vs no (n = 26) 0.91 (0.29–2.92) .88
Location of LVO; M2 segment (n = 40) vs distal internal carotid artery and/or M1 segment (n = 42) 6.77 (1.79–25.57) .005
a

Nos. in parentheses in column 1 represent the number of CTA scans.