Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD002256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002256.pub2

Comparison 5. Intramuscular ceftriaxone versus intravenous cephazolin.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Cure rates 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.97, 1.11]
2 Recurrent infection 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.17, 3.06]
3 Preterm delivery 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.15, 2.29]
4 Admission to neonatal intensive care unit 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.51, 2.16]
5 Need for change of antibiotic 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.97 [0.37, 10.32]
6 Indicence of prolonged pyrexia 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.47 [0.44, 4.96]