Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4

Comparison 4. combined regimen mifepristone/prostaglandin: time of prostaglandin.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 failure to achieve complete abortion 7   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 day 3 vs day 1 1 1489 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.94 [1.05, 3.58]
1.2 day 3 vs day 2 1 1521 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.69 [0.95, 3.01]
1.3 day 2 vs day 1(all) 3 3687 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.95, 1.63]
1.4 day 2 vs day 1(</= 49 days) 1 941 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.81 [0.49, 1.36]
1.5 day 2 vs day 1(> 49 days) 1 1182 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.62 [1.11, 2.38]
1.6 day 2 vs day 0 2 511 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.39 [0.24, 0.65]
1.7 day 1 vs day 0(all) 2 2156 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.46, 0.92]
1.8 day 1 vs day 0(</= 49 days) 2 998 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.38, 1.14]
1.9 day 1 vs day 0(> 49 days) 2 1158 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.41, 1.06]
2 side effects 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 nausea day 3 vs day 1 1 1358 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.96, 1.14]
2.2 nausea day 3 vs day 2 1 1384 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.91, 1.06]
2.3 nausea day 2 vs day 1 1 1434 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.98, 1.16]
2.4 nausea day 2 vs day 0 2 444 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.58, 1.11]
2.5 vomiting day 3 vs day 1 1 1358 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.86, 1.19]
2.6 vomiting day 3 vs day 2 1 1384 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.83, 1.13]
2.7 vomiting day 2 vs day 1 1 1434 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.90, 1.22]
2.8 vomiting day 2 vs day 0 2 444 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.59, 1.36]
2.9 diarrhoea day 3 vs day 1 1 1358 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.21 [0.99, 1.48]
2.10 diarrhoea day 3 vs day 2 1 1384 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.95, 1.42]
2.11 diarrhoea day 2 vs day 1 1 1434 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.85, 1.28]
2.12 diarrhoea day 2 vs day 0 2 444 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.41, 1.03]
2.13 nausea day 1 vs day 0 2 2137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.78, 1.31]
2.14 vomiting day 1 vs day 0 2 2137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.79, 1.62]
2.15 diarrhoea day 1 vs day 0 2 2137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.58, 1.18]
3 surgical evacuation 5 8330 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.76, 1.27]
3.1 day 3 vs day 1 1 1489 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.49 [0.78, 2.83]
3.2 day 3 vs day 2 1 1521 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.80 [0.92, 3.52]
3.3 day 2 vs day 1 2 3681 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.68, 1.67]
3.4 day 2 vs day 0 2 511 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.40 [0.19, 0.85]
3.5 day 1 vs day 0 1 1128 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.36, 1.20]
4 ongoing pregnancy 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 day 3 vs day 1 1 1489 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [0.51, 4.73]
4.2 day 3 vs day 2 1 1521 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.71 [0.72, 10.16]
4.3 day 2 vs day 1 (all) 2 3681 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.45, 1.90]
4.4 day 1 vs day 0 2 2208 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.07, 1.66]
5 women dissatisfied with the procedure 1 1349 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.68, 1.47]