Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003306. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003306.pub2

Khafagy 2006.

Methods Randomised prospective study comparing various outcomes between Ileal and ileocaecal bladder replacement surgery 
 Single centre study 
 Ileal neobladder (studer type reconstruction) 
 All patients had perineal exercises following surgery 
 3 monthly follow‐up
Participants Inclusion: All patients with muscle invasive disease undergoing radical cystectomy 
 Excl: Patients with memebranous urethral involvement.
Interventions Group 1: Ileal neobladder (29) 
 Group 2: Ileocaecal neobladder (31)
Outcomes Urinary leakage 
 Wound infection 
 Deep vein thrombosis 
 Jaundice 
 Anuria 
 Urinary incontinence 
 Serum biochemistry 
 Upper tract dilatation 
 Cancer outcomes
Notes No mention of methods of randomisation 
 Urodynamics studies done on follow‐up only in 13 patients (5 in group 1 and 8 in group 2)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk were randomised into two groups
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 29 patients Group A, 31 patients Group B four patients died after surgery, two in each group