Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003288.pub3

Carver 1995.

Methods Method of randomisation: not stated 
 Assessor blinding: unclear whether all or some outcomes 
 Intention to treat: not carried out, those unable to consume supplements not included in the analysis 
 Lost to follow‐up: intervention 2 withdrawn due to reluctance to take extra drinks, 1 withdrawn due to objection to being weighed and measured; control 1 withdrawn due to reluctance to take extra drinks, 2 withdrawn due to objection to being weighed and measured 
 Timing of intervention: 12 weeks, twice daily
Participants Location: All residents of care of the elderly wards at a large psychiatric teaching hospital, Edinburgh 
 46 patients 
 Inclusion criteria: diagnosed as having some degree of senile dementia, BMI 15.1‐19.9 
 Exclusion criteria: physical pathology, likely to be discharged during the study period, no consent from relatives 
 Sex: 36 female, 10 male 
 Age: men: mean age 68‐69y, women: 79‐80y 
 Health Status: malnourished, senile dementia
Interventions a: 200 ml oral supplement Fortisip twice daily providing 600 kcal/day in addition to normal meals 
 b: 200 ml oral vitamin preparation twice daily providing the same vitamins as Fortisip, but virtually no macronutrients, in addition to normal meals 
 Allocated: 23/23 
 Assessed: 20/20
Outcomes Main outcomes: 
 Mortality 
 Additional outcomes: 
 Measures of nutritional status ‐ weight change, body mass index, mid upper arm circumference, triceps skinfold 
 Patient compliance ‐ numbers consuming all drinks offered
Notes Request for further details sent 18/9/01 on method of randomisation, blinding of outcome assessors and treatment providers and further details of anthropometry outcomes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? High risk C ‐ Inadequate