Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003288.pub3

Gariballa 2006.

Methods Method of randomisation: generated by trial statistician, sequentially numbered opaque envelopes kept in different city, phoned for randomisation 
 Assessor blinding: action taken to blind assessors through use of identical placebo 
 Intention to treat: carried out 
 Lost to follow‐up: intervention 0; control 0 
 Timing of intervention: up to four weeks duration or until death or discharge 
 Length of follow‐up: 6 months
Participants Location: university hospital, UK 
 445 patients 
 Inclusion criteria: acutely ill hospitalised patients aged 65y or more, able to swallow, able to sign consent 
 Exclusion criteria: gastric surgery, malabsorption, BMI > 40kg/m2, coma, severe dementia (Abbreviated Mental Test score < 6), malignancy, living in an institution, already taking supplements 
 Sex: 234 female, 211 male 
 Age: mean age 77y
Interventions Bottles of supplement given at 08.00 and 12.00 for 6 weeks, including in the community if out of hospital 
 a: 2 bottles of 200ml each, providing in total 995kcal, 50g protein and 100% of reference nutrient intake for vitamins and minerals, and standard hospital diet 
 b: 2 placebo bottles of 200ml each, providing in total 60kcal and no protein or micronutrients, and standard hospital diet 
 Allocated: 223/222 
 Assessed: 223/222 (at 6 months)
Outcomes Main outcomes: 
 Mortality 
 Morbidity and complications ‐ infections 
 Length of acute hospital stay 
 Readmissions 
 Functional status ‐ Barthel Index, cognitive function in subgroup 
 Additional outcomes: 
 Measures of nutritional status ‐ weight, mid upper arm circumference, triceps skinfold 
 Measures of dietary intake ‐ energy and protein intake
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate