Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;25(6):1422. doi: 10.3390/molecules25061422

Table 5.

Interaction analysis of Lycopus spp. infusions, luteolin-7-O-glucuronide, and rosmarinic acid.

Method Sample Combination IC50 (μg/mL) a r b CI c SDA d Combined Effect DRI e
ABTS LeuB:RA 2.32 0.97 0.66 ±0.01 Synergism 7.19:1.25
LeuB:LGlr 6.64 0.98 0.83 ±0.01 Moderate synergism 2.64:2.22
LGlr:RA 2.74 0.98 0.81 ±0.01 Moderate synergism 5.38:1.61
LeuB:RA:LGlr 3.39 0.99 0.80 ±0.01 Moderate synergism 7.74:1.95:6.52
DPPH Lex:RA 2.75 0.96 0.93 ±0.01 Nearly additive effect 6.03:1.31
Lex:LGlr 2.96 0.97 0.63 ±0.01 Synergism 5.60:2.22
LGlr:RA 1.90 0.96 0.81 ±0.03 Moderate synergism 3.46:1.90
Lex:RA:LGlr 2.57 0.99 0.84 ±0.01 Moderate synergism 9.70:2.12:3.85
DCFH-DA Lex:RA 0.73 0.98 0.74 ±0.01 Moderate synergism 6.00:1.74
Lex:LGlr 0.98 0.98 0.75 ±0.02 Moderate synergism 4.44:1.91
LGlr:RA 0.54 0.96 0.72 ±0.02 Moderate synergism 3.45:2.32
Lex:RA:LGlr 0.58 0.99 0.61 ±0.01 Synergism 11.16:3.23:4.80

a IC50 (μg/mL) of the equal mass concentration infusion combinations; b r—linear correlation coefficient of the median effect plot; c CI—combination index, a quantitative determination of drug interactions based on the mass action law, where CI < 1, = 1, and > 1 indicate synergism, additive effect, and antagonism, respectively (the combined effect is evaluated according to Chou [24]); d SDA—sequential deletion analysis, iterative sequential deletion of one dose (or concentration) of a drug at a time for repetitive CI calculations; e DRI—dose reduction index shows the extent that the dose of each drug in a synergistic combination can be reduced at a given effect level compared with the doses of each sample alone; LeuA—L. europaeus A; LeuB—L. europaeus B; LeuC—L. europaeus C; Lex—L. exaltatus; LGlr—luteolin-7-O-glucuronide; RA—rosmarinic acid.