Table 3. Results of Bayesian meta-analyses indicate that our data mostly provide clear support for the absence of an amnestic effect.

First, all performed studies are included, afterwards subdivided in conceptual or exact replication attempts (with or without exclusion of subjects showing less than 25% freezing during reactivation). BF₁₀ quantifies evidence in favor of the H_A (i.e., presence of an amnestic effect), relative to the H₀ (i.e., absence of an amnestic effect). For clarity, BF₀₁, quantifying evidence in favor of the H₀ relative to the H_A (= 1/BF₁₀), is also provided.

Studies included	# Experiments	N	HA	Excluded subjects	BF10	BF01
All	26	295	MDZ<SAL	Freezing <25% during reactivation session	.19	5.28
All	26	308	MDZ<SAL	None	.17	5.83
Conceptual	20	205	MDZ<SAL	Freezing <25% during reactivation session	.10	10.31
Conceptual	20	218	MDZ<SAL	None	.09	11.03
Exact	6	90	MDZ<SAL	None	1.93	.52
Conceptual	12	91	PROP<SAL	Freezing <25% during reactivation session	.20	5.07
Conceptual	12	98	PROP<SAL	None	.23	4.37